[FM Discuss] Fwd: [Consortium] Outrageous disaster: Ogg/Vorbis spec taken out of HTML-5
Seth Woodworth
seth at isforinsects.com
Mon Dec 17 09:05:56 PST 2007
The Nodia brief doesn't actually mention OGG being proprietary. It simply
complains about it's lack of DRM. /. always bothers me with stuff like
this. Still this is an awful blow.
I've seen a few very good examples recently of OGG/theora, namely
Waveplace.org's website and Colingo.org's language/phrase videos.
I've been trying to help Ben at Colingo to encode with Ogg/theora+speex.
Vorbis was very wasteful for the spoken audio that he was using. It took a
couple extra steps for me, not being super familiar with ffmpeg2theora, but
I would be glad to document the final processes.
On Dec 17, 2007 6:42 AM, adam hyde <adam at flossmanuals.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > the sad thing is that this untrue claim of ogg/theora/vorbis being
> > proprietary due to patent liability is just a facade: media giants such
> > as Apple have bee lobbying the W3C hard against including
> > ogg/theora/vorbis in the HTML-5 specification in favour of their own DRM
> > capable Quicktime technology.
> >
> > Nokia is just playing cloak-and-daggers to look after upstream channel
> > providers for their handsets IMO.
> >
> > it doesn't matter how 'good' the technology is: if it doesn't support
> > DRM then standards bodies like the W3C will be shoved and bribed -
> > as they are now - until a DRM capable platform becomes default.
> >
> > this may get quite messy. education as to the real root of this problem
> is
> > important to leverage public concern to pressure the W3C to change their
> > mind. HTML is spoken by 100's of millions of people afterall.
> >
>
>
> its nasty business alright. Unfortunately however, Theora doesn't seem
> to be maintained as well as it was a few years ago. There was mention in
> the Slashdot forum about this and its sad but true. Theora is lagging
> behind the dev. Still its very useful and we should do what we can to
> provide good docs on how to get the most out of it.
>
> adam
>
>
>
> > julian
> >
> --
> Adam Hyde
> FLOSS Manuals
>
> http://www.flossmanuals.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/pipermail/discuss-flossmanuals.net/attachments/20071217/6f1ef0d1/attachment.htm>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list