[FM Discuss] flyer text advice

sophea hello at phonebox.org
Mon Apr 21 15:03:49 PDT 2008


oops - i accidentally took the discussion offlist - putting it back on now...

2008/4/22 adam hyde <adam at flossmanuals.net>:
> hey
>
>
>  On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 22:55 +0530, sophea wrote:
>  > hiya adam
>  >
>  > random brainstorming follows - chuck the chaff
>  >
>  > you probably know the sarai publication 'floss is not just good for your teeth'
>  > http://www.sarai.net/publications/occasional/floss-is-not-just-good-for-teeth
>  > i think there are some good bits in there that look from the point of
>  > view of the audience you are talking about - in any case it might be a
>  > good reference to give for ppl who want to know more.
>  >
>
>  I didnt know about this actually. Its quite interesting - I especially
>  like the diagram on page four of the four freedoms.
>
>  1 Users are allowed to run the software for any purpose
>  2 Users are able to closely examine and study the software and are able
>  to freely modify and improve it to fill their needs better
>  3 Users are able to give copies of the software to other people to whom
>  the software will be useful
>  4 Users are able to improve the software and freely distribute their
>  improvements to the broader public so that they, as a whole, benefit
>
>  Its sending me back to Free Software 101, but thats a good thing in this
>  instance. I think these freedoms can be appealing to new users except
>  2&4 are for geeks and might put a newbie off a bit. Is it possible, or
>  advisable to emphasise 1,3 + 'free' as in gratis?
>
>
>
>  > i think that clear examples of common applications that can be
>  > replaced is probably the most convincing - maybe give brief case
>  > scenarios - this way you can include the different reasons people
>  > might have.
>
>  good idea...what about a chart co-relating softwares:
>  ff              - IE
>  gimp            - pshop
>  inkscape        - indesign
>  openoffice      - word
>
>
>  etc...any other substitutions that would appeal to a new user (not on
>  the OS level ;)?
>
>
>  >
>  > i don't think it's great to emphasise teh free as in $ too much as
>  > using free software does usually require someone to enter into a
>  > relationship with a community at some level - maybe one of the things
>  > that FM does is bridge that gap between different cultures of use -
>  > you can read an FM manual without knowing that RTFM doesn't mean 'read
>  > the floss manual'.
>
>  Do you think free software leads to engagement with a community? I am
>  thinking about FF and OO....I havent ever interacted with these orgs on
>  any level...i'm a fan of highlighting the community idea for attracting
>  people, but i think that the communities surrounding these softwares are
>  specialised and quite small...not that enticing for newbies i think...or
>  am i wrong about this?
>
>
>
>  >
>  > think that a lot of people also don't realise that a lot of things
>  > they already use are free & open software eg firefox
>  > or that a lot of big business uses free software - somehow this info
>  > counters people preconceptions about it as an 'amateur' activity.
>  >
>  > if you can present it less as a big switch than as a continuation of
>  > something they already do and something that people and orgs familiar
>  > to them are already doing around them - and explain why more and more
>  > people/businesses/governmets are thinking this way and how FM is there
>  > to  help them join the crowd... maybe?
>
>  good idea.
>
>
>  >
>  > i don't know if feeling like a pirate is such a bad thing - the same
>  > ppl might be doing their bit for the digital commoning on piratebay.
>  > possibly emphasise that amount of viruses and bad systems busting
>  > features of cracks that using dodgy warez tends to lead to - and
>  > instead of a community for support you can't get any help because you
>  > hvent registered and the person who you got the thing from is
>  > anonymous and the site has probably moved. using dodgy software is not
>  > like watching a lousy copy of a movie if you happen to luck out on a
>  > download.
>
>  also a good point...
>
>  Will ponder these more, thanks for the comments :) I'm wondering if
>  there is a way to bring all these together:
>  * the 4 freedoms (or maybe emphasise the 2 i mentioned)
>  * free as in gratis
>  * use case scenarios
>  * continuation
>  * pirate sw can be bad for your health
>
>  It seems like a lot for one flyer so I am wondering if perhaps a series
>  of flyers emphasising different points might be interesting. or we just
>  have to focus it more in which case some kind of ordering (most -> least
>  appealing) of these arguments is required...
>
>  Any more thoughts from anyone on this?
>
>  adam
>
>
>
>  >
>  > anyway - that's the 2c that came out when i pressed the button ;)
>  >
>  > xs
>  >
>  > On 20/04/2008, adam hyde <adam at flossmanuals.net> wrote:
>  > > hi,
>  > >
>  > >  I'm just putting together a flyer to explain FLOSS Manuals. It is
>  > >  intended for general use - at conferences, in media spaces, for
>  > >  workshops etc. The target audience is - people that do not know there is
>  > >  such a thing as free software.
>  > >
>  > >  First on the topic of 'free' and target audience - I tend to think the
>  > >  emphasis should be on the _free_ as in gratis. Licensing is not
>  > >  necessary something that people understand the importance of straight
>  > >  away and it is complex to explain.
>  > >
>  > >  Its a different rationale than the traditional free vs open source
>  > >  argument. For business 'free' was something they wanted to get rid of as
>  > >  (the argument goes) business people don't want 'free' as they believe
>  > >  you get what you pay for - if you pay nothing you get nothing (esp.
>  > >  relevant with questions regarding warranty etc). However for the desktop
>  > >  home user I think free is a very important word. Free, as in $, is more
>  > >  important (on a first glance) to these users than free as in libre.
>  > >
>  > >  So, thats the rationale I have for a 'target' demographic - people that
>  > >  do not know about free software and can benefit from :
>  > >  * not feeling like a pirate or
>  > >  * saving money
>  > >
>  > >  Just to be clear - I'm not arguing that free, as in $, is more important
>  > >  for the rationale of free software itself, but that the $ angle is a
>  > >  stronger marketing position when speaking to people that know nothing
>  > >  (or little) about free software.
>  > >
>  > >  On the other side of this is the point that 'free software' in these
>  > >  terms can sound like a tacky sales pitch for bad 'special bin'
>  > >  merchandise. So...I am struggling with this line and would appreciate
>  > >  any suggestions on how to walk it.
>  > >
>  > >  As for the design (Lotte will create a design) - I am imagining
>  > >  something with 4 panels. A front page and 3 fold out panels for
>  > >  read/write/remix. The design will use icons if we can develop some nice
>  > >  explanatory icons for the concepts.
>  > >
>  > >  So, the first thing to get right is the text. I have made one stab at it
>  > >  (below).
>  > >
>  > >  I would appreciate any advice on the direction, rationale, and tone of
>  > >  this.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  ===================
>  > >  * front panel*
>  > >  Did you know there are hundreds of softwares for Mac, Windows and Linux
>  > >  that are made by communities of programmers for you to use – for free.
>  > >
>  > >  FLOSS Manuals provides free manuals where to get and how to use free
>  > >  software.
>  > >  http://www.flossmanuals.net
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  * proceeding panels*
>  > >  READ
>  > >  http://www.flossmanuals.net/read
>  > >  Learn to use free software for word processing, browsing, audio and
>  > >  video production, image manipulation, file sharing, creating vector
>  > >  graphics, desktop publishing, 3d graphics, creating webpages and more!
>  > >  Read manuals online or download each as a PDF. All manuals are free to
>  > >  use and distribute.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  WRITE
>  > >  http://www.flossmanuals.net/write
>  > >  If you know something about free software you can contribute to and
>  > >  improve the manuals! You don't need to learn complex wiki syntax –
>  > >  instead you can make changes online as if you were using a word
>  > >  processor. If you have ever wanted to contribute to the world of free
>  > >  software but are not a programmer then contribute to FLOSS Manuals!
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  REMIX
>  > >  http://www.flossmanuals.net/remix
>  > >  Make your own manual for inhouse training, teaching, workshops or self
>  > >  learning. Drag and drop chapters from the manuals using REMIX to create
>  > >  and download a PDF, HTML (in a zip or tar file), or embed the manual in
>  > >  your website with our 'Live Manual' API.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >  Adam Hyde
>  > >  FLOSS Manuals
>  > >
>  > >  http://www.flossmanuals.net
>  > >  + 31 6 2808 7108
>  > >
>  > >  _______________________________________________
>  > >  Discuss mailing list
>  > >  Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
>  > >  http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  --
>  Adam Hyde
>  FLOSS Manuals
>
>  http://www.flossmanuals.net
>  + 31 6 2808 7108
>
>



-- 
sophea lerner
sonic media artist + researcher
new delhi, india
hello at phonebox.org
mob: +91 9910617449



More information about the Discuss mailing list