[FM Discuss] groups that are companies, one manual groups etc

Michael McAndrew michaelmcandrew at thirdsectordesign.org
Thu Dec 16 11:26:32 PST 2010


Just looked at http://booki.flossmanuals.net/ and CiviCRM looks totally out
of place in it's eponymous group :)

How can I change the group name to CRM :p

or should i just delete the group and start again?





On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Lachlan Musicman <datakid at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:12, adam <adam at xs4all.nl> wrote
> >> As to how you group projects on the ibook site, the Zotonic User
> Documentation would fit well in with other content management systems.
> Realistically, though, I'm not sure how much cross
> communication/collaboration one would expect across projects since different
> CMSs run on different platforms and meet different needs. On the other hand,
> grouping under functionality would be useful for folks who wish to survey
> options within a solution area.
>
> While the idea of a company/platform/etc using booki as advertising is
> distasteful, I don't think it's the driving excuse to not have
> companies as separate groups, and nor do I think that cross
> collaboration as the main reason for having type based groups. I think
> the driving reason to have groups based around software types rather
> than production houses is clutter. I would absolutely know what was
> meant by group:CMS, but I've only just found out about Zotonic (as an
> example, frantically reading up on it now :) ) and would have no idea
> what it meant. If the groups were filled with that type of entry, it
> would be hard to navigate. Whereas if I went to group:CMS and then
> found Zotonic in there, I would know straight away what it was and I
> could investigate further if I felt it was necessary/wanted to
> contribute.
>
> There will always be software types that don't fit into the groups
> that exist, but I think that is a lesser issue than the clutter of a
> thousand groups for a thousand production houses
>
> cheers
> L.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "... imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an
> interesting world I find myself in - an interesting hole I find myself
> in - fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me
> staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such
> a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up
> and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, it's still
> frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be
> alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to
> have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by
> surprise."
> Douglas Adams
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
>



-- 
Michael McAndrew
07817 802299 (mobile)

Third Sector Design Ltd.
http://thirdsectordesign.org

For support, email support at thirdsectordesign.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/pipermail/discuss-flossmanuals.net/attachments/20101216/a0cad06f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Discuss mailing list