[FM Discuss] questions about place
adam
adam at xs4all.nl
Sun Feb 7 12:39:35 PST 2010
im sorry but im not sure why anyone might believe that we would produce
software that wasnt free software...
maybe thats why i didnt understand the question...
adam
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:34 -0600, Janet Swisher wrote:
> What he said. Booki as software, not just booki as a service.
> Download, discuss, contribute, etc. for the software itself. Is that
> part of the picture?
>
> By analogy, identi.ca is a service that uses the FLOS software
> StatusNet. You can either download the StatusNet software, or use it
> as a hosted service. My thought was that flossmanuals.net would be one
> of potentially many services that use booki software, possibly as a
> hosted service. (I don't to push this analogy too far, as StatusNet is
> also a business that provides customization and support, which is a
> whole other issue that is off the track of the current discussion.) My
> main question is: is booki just a service, or is it also a software
> package?
>
> --Janet
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Joshua Facemyer <jfacemyer at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I had thought that I had remembered from a previous discussion
> that booki as a platform (not as a service) was also going to
> be offered as FLOSS. If this is the case, the question is how
> does that goal fit into the rest of the picture?
>
> As for your explanation, that helps to clarify a lot, and I
> like the vision. It makes more sense in perspective. (You
> should probably give a fuller perspective at the outset when
> asking complicated questions ;)
>
> JF
>
>
> adam wrote:
> i'm not sure i understand the point...promotion? we
> have never been good
> at it, i have to say, but promotion comes down to us
> telling people
> about what we do...for example, i do a lot of talking
> about fm, book
> sprints, specific manuals, free documentation, free
> manuals, free
> culture, free content etc etc etc ...at these i would
> choose to talk
> about booki when appropriate and not at other
> times...im not sure i get
> the question though...
>
>
> adam
>
>
> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 10:08 -0600, Janet Swisher
> wrote:
>
> I get the reasons for separating FM's
> publishing aspect from Booki's
> content-development aspect. However, Joshua
> has a point that there is
> a third aspect, which is the development and
> promotion of the booki
> software itself. Where does that fit into this
> picture?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
More information about the Discuss
mailing list