[FM Discuss] wysiwyg

Micz Flor micz.flor at sourcefabric.org
Fri Nov 4 07:50:25 PDT 2011


Thinking outside the wyg box
http://www.wymeditor.org/

There are other wysiwy mean editors. It seems wrong at first sight and a bit laTex outdated. 

But to heaten up the debate i argue that it would open many more api standards for booki and theredore make it more future proof. 

Just a thought :)

On Nov 4, 2011, at 3:42 PM, adam <adam at flossmanuals.net> wrote:

> yeah, been looking at that too. seems good but tinymce seems to be rocketing at the moment with support and dev...xinha has stopped dev pretty much which is why we are looking around.
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/04/2011 03:33 PM, Michael Downey wrote:
>>> On Nov 4, 2011, at 3:19 PM, adam<adam at flossmanuals.net>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> we are considering tinymce but open to suggestions
>> 
>> Some folks on our team have been satisfied with CKEditor: http://ckeditor.com/
>> 
>> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
>> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
> 
> -- 
> 
> --
> Adam Hyde
> Founder, FLOSS Manuals
> Project Manager, Booki
> Book Sprint Facilitator
> mobile :+ 49 177 4935122
> identi.ca : @eset
> booki.flossmanuals.net : @adam
> 
> http://www.flossmanuals.net
> http://www.booki.cc
> http://www.booksprints.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net



More information about the Discuss mailing list