[FM Discuss] Is it possible to use CC by-sa license?

[Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona]

Great!

Anyway, just out of curiosity: why only GPL and CCo? GPL is usually not
considered suitable for documentation not accompanying software (such as
manuals), and CC0 means you're no longer copyright holder. CC by-sa is
usually considered as the "equivalent" of GPL for non-software works...

[Sorry if this was already discussed: if so, please just point me to the
discussion]

Saludos,

	Jesus.

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 01:50 +0200, adam hyde wrote:
> if migrating content thats ok...migrate the content and then ping the 
> list and we will change the license :)
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
> On 18/10/11 01:47, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new to this mailing list (and to flossmanuals). I was planning to
> > move a book on free software that I (with others) had on Berlios [1] to
> > FLOSSManuals, but when opening a new book, I'm given only CC0 and GPL as
> > options for the license. In this case, we should be using CC by-sa. Is
> > that possible somehow?
> >
> > [I've browsed the site and mailing list a bit, and didn't found an
> > answer to this, except for some references that "license must be GPL".
> > But just in case this were old policy, I prefered to ask...]
> >
> > Saludos,
> >
> > 	Jesus.
> >
> > [1] http://curso-sobre.berlios.de/introsobre/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net

-- 
http://identi.ca/jgbarah            http://twitter.com/jgbarah