[FM Discuss] Recruiting more editors for book sprints

adam hyde adam at flossmanuals.net
Tue Oct 25 03:43:02 PDT 2011



On 23/10/11 07:50, Jennifer wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I'm pretty much game for anything, though my technical abilities are
> basically those of the average non-technical end user. My research
> involves the rhetoric of FLOSS, intellectual property, and composing
> processes in technical communication.

interesting. well, i wonder if you would enjoy getting into the process 
with a remote sprint - there is the thunderbird sprint coming up  more 
info here:
http://scottnesbitt.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=floss_manuals:thunderbird_update_sprint

after this we will be having more sprint conferences. we had one last 
week and made 4 books at once. we are aiming to do more of this starting 
early next year...these events will combine unconf with Book Sprints...

adam


>
> Jennifer
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:21 AM, adam hyde <adam at flossmanuals.net
> <mailto:adam at flossmanuals.net>> wrote:
>
>     hey Jennifer,
>
>     What kind of topics are you interested in? There are some sprints
>     coming up soon that you might be interested in.
>
>     adam
>
>
>     On 23/10/11 06:04, Jennifer wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I'd love to get involved with FLOSS but am a little unsure about
>         how to
>         go about doing so. I'm an academic who teaches various technical
>         writing
>         courses and have a couple years experience as a technical writer and
>         editor in the field of civil engineering. The reason that I'm
>         responding
>         to your post is that as an academic, my university will pay my
>         expenses
>         to attend a conference as long as I'm presenting at it. I know
>         that with
>         Google Summer of Code, there was an unconference. Is it typical
>         for a
>         book sprint to also have a conference or unconference that would
>         allow
>         an academic such as myself to have her way paid by her
>         university? And
>         is this an avenue from which FLOSS might be interested in
>         cultivating
>         contributors?
>
>         Jennifer Maher
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Andy Oram <andyo at oreilly.com
>         <mailto:andyo at oreilly.com>
>         <mailto:andyo at oreilly.com <mailto:andyo at oreilly.com>>> wrote:
>
>             At the Google Summer of Code sprint this past week I intervened
>             heavily in the writing process of the team I was involved
>         with. They
>             told me at the end that they wouldn't have been able to do
>         the book
>             without my help. From discussions during the full-group
>         meetings I got
>             the sense that Anne Gentle played a similar role for her
>         team, and
>             probably other "floaters" did too. My own suggestions ranged
>         from the
>             macro-level to the micro-level. They included:
>
>             * Pointing out that certain sections assumed certain
>         background, and
>             that perhaps they're readers needed additional background
>         sections.
>             Similarly, I highlighted confusing passages as symptoms of
>         missing
>             information, and helped the authors decide whether to remove
>         them or
>             to write new chapters to cover them adequately.
>
>             * Helping to finalize the outline by asking questions while
>         we were
>             writing chapters, such as "what ties all these chapters
>         together?"
>
>             * Rewriting chapters to move prerequisites before the
>         processes that
>             depend on them, and other such rearrangements.
>
>             * Adding introductions and transitional passages.
>
>             Editing proved to be more than a one-time activity. The help
>         I gave
>             could not be encapsulated into a phone call during the
>         initial outline
>             process. Nor could it be imposed at the end during a post-sprint
>             cleanup. IRC is not enough bandwidth to intervene in live
>         discussions.
>             I've done all of those activities and I think they can be
>         moderately
>             helpful, but nothing can substitute from being present while
>         the book
>             grows organically and helping to splice, graft, and prune.
>
>             I assume Adam has reached the same conclusions, and that's
>         why he
>             invited floaters to the sprint last week. The question is
>         how this
>             could be done at every sprint. The organizers are paying a
>         lot of
>             money already to bring subject-matter experts to the sprint.
>         While
>             these experts do it for love of community and the chance to meet
>             fellow community members, outside editors need extra incentives.
>             Projects may be able to find someone associated with the
>         project who
>             can do light editing and fix style and grammar errors, but
>         they are
>             highly unlikely to find someone with professional skills as a
>             developmental editor.
>
>             However, I can't believe most funders would be willing to
>         pay for
>             their travel and add in enough money to make it a worthwhile
>         career
>             option for a professional writer or editor. Perhaps if they
>         happen to
>             find a qualified local person where the spring is being
>         held, they
>             could devote some compensation to enlisting participation.
>         That's
>             asking for a lot of luck.
>
>             So as always I'm pondering the value of professionalism in
>             crowdsourced work like this, and how it can be
>         institutionalized.
>
>             Andy
>             ___________________________________________________
>             Discuss mailing list
>         Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
>         <mailto:Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net>
>         <mailto:Discuss at lists.__flossmanuals.net
>         <mailto:Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net>>
>         http://lists.flossmanuals.net/____listinfo.cgi/discuss-____flossmanuals.net
>         <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/__listinfo.cgi/discuss-__flossmanuals.net>
>         <http://lists.flossmanuals.__net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-__flossmanuals.net
>         <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net>>
>
>
>
>
>
>         _________________________________________________
>         Discuss mailing list
>         Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
>         <mailto:Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net>
>         http://lists.flossmanuals.net/__listinfo.cgi/discuss-__flossmanuals.net
>         <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net>
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Discuss mailing list
>     Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net <mailto:Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net>
>     http://lists.flossmanuals.net/__listinfo.cgi/discuss-__flossmanuals.net
>     <http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net



More information about the Discuss mailing list