[FM Discuss] Book Sprint Badges

[adam]

talked to Philipp Schmidt from P2PU briefly today about this. So, the 
plan is - Mick Fuzz is coming to Berlin in a few weeks and he and I will 
work for 3-4 days on this and create a strategy based for workbooks and 
badges on the discussion on the list. We will look at building a 
prototype and then think about how it could all be done.

If we wish to work with P2PU then the P2PU bunch are in Berlin 2 weeks 
after Mick is here so I can bring up any ideas we conjured up directly 
with them.

its mick leading the charge, me playing support and the rest of us 
telling him what to do ;) so make sure you get heard!

adam

On 17/04/12 10:52, adam wrote:
>
>
> On 04/17/2012 09:39 AM, Mick Fuzz wrote:
>
>>
>> So then, (puts black hat on again) - Why do the software learning badges
>> on FM at all? (as opposed to the community / workshop leader badges) -
>> P2PU seems like a much more natural vehicle for these kinds of badges.
>>
>> Does it not make sense to build better links with them, so that the FM
>> manuals can be used in P2PU courses, and educators encouraged to use
>> them, and to maintain them.
>>
>> This gets around the hassle of having to bolt on badges to FM where they
>> are not part of the core mission. And builds bridges with another great
>> project and community.
>
> yes i agree to a point. it is a good idea to talk to p2pu. they are
> coming to berlin for may so i can talk to philipp schmidt and the crew then
>
> however i have tried before to get the manuals used in p2pu and did not
> get very far. but we can try again - but lets also talk about how we
> might do it ourselves...as a starter, how would you imagine it could
> work with p2pu?
>
>
>
>>
>> I think that an activity based badge rather than a quiz based badge is
>> probably the way to go.
>> And it makes sense what you are saying, but how does that fit into the
>> ecosystem of Open Badges? It seems a bit confusing potentially and a
>> badge saying or indicating 'unverified' would be a bit of lemon maybe.
>
> it needs thought...interested in other opinions
>
> adam
>
>
>>
>> I waited a bit before sending this as I think it would be great to hear
>> what other people think about how this could work and potential good and
>> bad aspects of it.
>>
>> nice one
>> mick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
>> http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net
>