[FM Discuss] translation

[Tomi Toivio]

2012/10/28 Mick Fuzz <mick at flossmanuals.net>:
> For translation, I'm guessing - someone correct me if I'm wrong here -
> that the side by side translation work flow got lost as Book Type got
> put into faster development and upgrading with more of a focus on Book
> Production than as a translation tool.

I find it easier to just import a manual and write the translation
directly on top of the old manual, so I don't see a need for
side-by-side translations at all. In my opinion there is actually no
need to add anything into Booktype for translation purposes. But it is
probably a matter of opinion and personal working style etc.

-- 
Best Regards
Tomi Toivio
Open Source Coordinator
http://fi.flossmanuals.net/
tomi at flossmanuals.net
+358453536625