<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">This looks better than my attempts with levels<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="monospace">wwww.tatiweb.org/ardour<br></font><div><br></div><div>What I did was also very simple. </div><div>If you go on Gimp to color, then levels you can see that you have presets. These presets you can ' record' and apply to all images. </div><div><br></div><div>You can import or make a setting for the levels. When you constrain the levels you get more contrast also, but you can do it with more nuances. I guess my settings are a bit too close to each other. What I wanted was to use the same setting for ALL the images. </div><div><br></div><div>Claudia </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>On Dec 9, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Joshua Facemyer wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>How does this look? It prints very nicely in B/W, and it's a bit less washed out.<br><br>I did a triple contrast with Imagemagick, since it seemed the issue was simply addressed with contrast.<br><br>If you want, I can do a couple more for a test (if so, recommend which others - especially some that will have more printing problems).<br><br>If this looks decent, I'll do the whole batch and make them available (sometime in the next couple of days).<br><br>JF<br><span><looping_02.contrast.png></span>_______________________________________________<br>Discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.flossmanuals.net">Discuss@lists.flossmanuals.net</a><br>http://lists.flossmanuals.net/listinfo.cgi/discuss-flossmanuals.net<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>