[FM Discuss] the muddle the model
Joshua Facemyer
jfacemyer at gmail.com
Sat Jan 30 11:54:20 PST 2010
mark wrote:
> On 30/01/10 18:00, Joshua Facemyer wrote:
>
>> Huh? DIY just means you've done something yourself rather than relying
>> on someone else. Pretty general conept. The DIY part would be having
>> the books printed yourself without having FM or someone else get them
>> printed for you. Meaning no middle-man. Hence, you've done the thing
>> yourself.
>>
>
> Sorry if this is heading a bit off-topic. My point was that exchanging
> goods for currency can never be DIY, because it depends upon the
> functioning of the economic system underpinning currency. So by taking
> goods (books) and selling them for money one accepts the capitalist
> model of valorisation, which is quite explicitly not DIY.
>
*First fallacy: currency-based economy does not equal capitalism.*
If you think about any bartering system (indeed, any act of bartering),
it implies an economy according to which the goods in question have
value. Simply because an economy is involved does not imply
capitalism. Money represents value - certainly in different times and
places it represents it in different ways. Money does not represent
capitalism. Talk to all the economies which have money and are not
capitalist.
*Second fallacy: one cannot do things oneself in a way that involves
capitalism/monetary exchange.*
That's just absurd. I do lots of things for myself within the context
of a capitalist economy. Capitalism (devoid of the unfortunate
corruptions which often invade such a system, or any economy, really) is
simply making a profit by selling or trading goods or services. This
does not prevent anyone from doing for himself.
I think, even if your assertions were close to the truth, which they are
not, they are certainly an extreme point of view and very cynical.
Basically your point comes down to this: don't pretend to take your
projects into your own hands if you're paying for goods or services in
order to do so, because really you're just fooling yourself.
That's a silly point of view.
JF
More information about the Discuss
mailing list