[FM Discuss] [CF] Re: need for CF mailing list // Fwd: historical collaborative writing

adam hyde adam at flossmanuals.net
Mon Jul 12 10:02:44 PDT 2010


On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 11:01 -0400, Mushon Zer-Aviv wrote:
> (ccing FM list [CF])
> 
> Hi Sissu and all,
> A single book will cost $7.50 to print at Lulu (not including the
> shipping and the ISBN)
> The specs are:
> A5, ~150pp, Standard paper, perfect bound, B&W printing (with full
> color covers)
> http://www.lulu.com/author/wizard/index.php
> Not sure what would the shipping costs be as we have multiple
> addresses to send to. But that's where we stand right now.
> Adam, Michael and Catherine probably have more experience in Lulu than
> I do. Can we get an estimate at how much would shipping be?

hi...ok, on the fm list are me, mushon and mike...shall i sub the rest
or do you want to do it individually?

as for the postal estimation - make a fake order from lulu and it will
tell you the exact shipping cost

adam


> 
> cheers,
> Mushon Zer-Aviv
> ע Shual.com - design studio
> §  ShiftSpace.org - an opensource layer above any website
> ¶  Mushon.com - blog
> × @mushon - Tweet me
> + 1-646-283-6057 
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/12/10 2:36 AM, sissu tarka wrote: 
> > 
> > Mushon 
> > thanks for all your work on this- *** 
> > 
> > prints, do you think we can ask amanda and paul for eyebeam to
> > sponsor a number of copies. i guess for them it's not such a huge
> > deal?!! 
> > 
> > hm. question also how many copies for each of us to circulate. 
> > how many copies can we get with $ 500. think you mentioned, but
> > forgot... 
> > 
> > 
> > soon 
> > sisssu 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Quoting Mushon Zer-Aviv <mushon at shual.com>: 
> > 
> > > On 7/9/10 9:25 PM, adam hyde wrote: 
> > > > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:15 -0700, Michael Mandiberg wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > > that if we use the list, we put a prefix on all emails. so a
> > > > > subject 
> > > > > line would read something like this: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > CF: I will get the ISBN 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > sounds good 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > and as per the title above, i will get the ISBN and let mushon
> > > > > know 
> > > > > how much it is. mushon, i will take repayment in the form of
> > > > > copies of 
> > > > > the new edition of the book. what is the deadline for ISBN. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > We're almost done editing, it is mainly a bit more work on the
> > > glossary and finishing the Futures section. 
> > > When we're done with that it's just final formatting of the PDF (I
> > > can't really do that before I know we have the final content) 
> > > I need the ISBN for the cover. I would say *by the end of next
> > > week we should send the book to be printed*. 
> > > > also, fm sent out 50 or so copies to academics and other
> > > > interested 
> > > > peoples of the first version, it might be interesting to send
> > > > the same 
> > > > people the second version...is there any cash to do this? (we
> > > > dont have 
> > > > the $ to print or sent them at the mo) 
> > > > 
> > > Currently we have around $500 to break into writer fees and
> > > (optionally) for printing. 
> > > So to judge by the writer fees each of us got in the first sprint
> > > (€500), I would say, no, we are broke. 
> > > > > I want to have the "What is collaboration anyway?" section as
> > > > > one of 
> > > > > the chapters in this NYU. Anyone have any advice, or want to
> > > > > do the 
> > > > > editing, or object to me doing it, or? Also, what is the best
> > > > > way to 
> > > > > notate authorship + writing process when taking a part out of
> > > > > the 
> > > > > original whole, and out of the context of FM? 
> > > > > 
> > > > just copy the names from the chapter credits on the CREDITS
> > > > chapters... 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > The way Wikipedia does the CC-BY-SA game is by a link to the
> > > article. I know it's contested and unstandardized. 
> > > I think I read a post some guy called Mike Linksomething wrote
> > > about the subject: 
> > > http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13232 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, for full disclosure, the chapter will retain its
> > > > > CC-BY-SA 
> > > > > license, but the *collection* of essays will be CC-BY-SA-NC.
> > > > > It is a 
> > > > > collection of works, therefore it does not activate copyleft:
> > > > > this was 
> > > > > a surprise to me. I spent six months negotiating, and even
> > > > > this 
> > > > > license was pushing the press WAY beyond its comfort zone.
> > > > > They would 
> > > > > not have done the book w/o the NC. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > i dont care...anyone else? i find licenses soooo boring...if its
> > > > reuse 
> > > > then my general answer is 'yeah yeah whatever'...but if you
> > > > wanna be zen 
> > > > about it you must get the ok from all authors...ugh..sorry i
> > > > said 
> > > > that... 
> > > > 
> > > > adam 
> > > > 
> > > Yeah, I don't mind either... get rich! 
> > > M. 
> > > > 
> > > > > m 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Mushon Zer-Aviv wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I generally agree with the generic best practice, and I see
> > > > > > Adam's 
> > > > > > rational in prefering 1 live list rather than 2 dormant
> > > > > > ones. 
> > > > > > I personally would like to see CF be a dormant one and have
> > > > > > people 
> > > > > > drop by whenever actual work is being (/needs to be) done on
> > > > > > the 
> > > > > > book. 
> > > > > > I am pretty sure the rest of the FM list would not have
> > > > > > appreciated 
> > > > > > the noise of our back and forth about glossary and
> > > > > > formatting and I 
> > > > > > would not really be interested in the internal discussion
> > > > > > over a 
> > > > > > book about ffmpeg2theora. It is like saying, if you are into
> > > > > > books, 
> > > > > > you'll be into any book. I beg to differ. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I say, if the list wants to try the FM list then let's do
> > > > > > that for a 
> > > > > > month, and then decide if we deserve our own place or not.
> > > > > > I 
> > > > > > personally think it would be more practical to start with
> > > > > > our own 
> > > > > > list. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Re: Michael's find 
> > > > > > Super interesting stuff... It would be great for this to be
> > > > > > either 
> > > > > > an case study or a glossary item. Are you into writing it? 
> > > > > > Even more important, would you help get us a new ISBN? I am
> > > > > > pretty 
> > > > > > overloaded with both CF and my own work and could really use
> > > > > > the 
> > > > > > help. I can give my CC or repay you or whatever. When we get
> > > > > > that 
> > > > > > done, I will calculate how much do we have left out of the
> > > > > > $1000 
> > > > > > fortune we got for the second sprint and will follow up with
> > > > > > Verina, 
> > > > > > Astra and Catherine to suck a few dollars as writer fees
> > > > > > from it. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > cheers, 
> > > > > > Mushon Zer-Aviv 
> > > > > > <shual_gray.gif>  Shual.com - design studio 
> > > > > > §  ShiftSpace.org - an opensource layer above any website 
> > > > > > ¶  Mushon.com - blog 
> > > > > > × @mushon - Tweet me 
> > > > > > + 1-646-283-6057 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 7/9/10 5:09 AM, Mike Linksvayer wrote: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Adam's advice is definitely the generic best practice --
> > > > > > > don't 
> > > > > > > split a list until it gets painful. Let's just use FM
> > > > > > > until/unless 
> > > > > > > we have a good problem to have. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Mike 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ps Anyone care if FM list just gets copied on this thread
> > > > > > > as an 
> > > > > > > intro? :-) 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:32 AM, adam 
> > > > > > > hyde<adam at flossmanuals.net>  wrote: 
> > > > > > >         its up to you guys. i think its usually better to
> > > > > > > add to a 
> > > > > > >         community and 
> > > > > > >         depart when it makes no more sense than to decide
> > > > > > > to set a 
> > > > > > >         new one up 
> > > > > > >         which may or may not gain momentum. there are
> > > > > > > plenty of 
> > > > > > >         people on the fm 
> > > > > > >         list that would find this post interesting. it is
> > > > > > > a 
> > > > > > >         community used to 
> > > > > > >         experimenting with the idea of books and the
> > > > > > > process of 
> > > > > > >         creating them 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         you could preface the subject with CF: - to catch
> > > > > > > y'all 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         adam 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 22:06 -0700, Michael
> > > > > > > Mandiberg 
> > > > > > >         wrote: 
> > > > > > >         >  i send this FYI, and also as a very good reason
> > > > > > > why i 
> > > > > > >         think there 
> > > > > > >         >  should be a CF specific mailing list (i had to
> > > > > > > go find 
> > > > > > >         an old email 
> > > > > > >         >  and copy-paste, rather than sending 
> > > > > > >         to CF-discuss at flossmanuals.net). i 
> > > > > > >         >  don't think this is appropriate for the FM
> > > > > > > list: i think 
> > > > > > >         it would get 
> > > > > > >         >  lost in that list, and i don't think it would
> > > > > > > reach any 
> > > > > > >         of the CF 
> > > > > > >         >  participants. I'm on the FM list, and I rarely
> > > > > > > read it 
> > > > > > >         at this point. 
> > > > > > >         >  too much noise, not enough signals directed at
> > > > > > > me. at 
> > > > > > >         some point, 
> > > > > > >         >  one-mailing-list-fits-all doesn't work
> > > > > > > anymore. 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  so... I just saw this in an email from LACE in
> > > > > > > Los 
> > > > > > >         Angeles. It is a 
> > > > > > >         >  collaborative writing project that refers back
> > > > > > > to work 
> > > > > > >         done by 
> > > > > > >         >  Bernadette Meyer, a NYC poet from the 70's and
> > > > > > > 80's. A 
> > > > > > >         bit of research 
> > > > > > >         >  from 
> > > > > > >         here: http://jacketmagazine.com/07/rifkin07.html
> > > > > > > lead me 
> > > > > > >         to these 
> > > > > > >         >  two paragraphs. thought you all would be
> > > > > > > interested 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  Unnatural Acts, the magazine that emerged from
> > > > > > > Mayer's 
> > > > > > >         Poetry Project 
> > > > > > >         >  workshop in 1972, also reflects a certain
> > > > > > > resistance, 
> > > > > > >         and suggests the 
> > > > > > >         >  distinct environment of the workshop as it
> > > > > > > contributed 
> > > > > > >         to the 
> > > > > > >         >  variegated nature of the St. Mark's scene as a
> > > > > > > whole. In 
> > > > > > >         its treatment 
> > > > > > >         >  of authorship and issues of literary property,
> > > > > > > Unnatural 
> > > > > > >         Acts might be 
> > > > > > >         >  situated on a continuum with such precursor
> > > > > > > little 
> > > > > > >         magazines as Cid 
> > > > > > >         >  Corman's Origin and Berrigan's "C," but it
> > > > > > > positions 
> > > > > > >         itself so far 
> > > > > > >         >  down that line that it ends up constituting a
> > > > > > > major 
> > > > > > >         departure. In its 
> > > > > > >         >  first issue, Unnatural Acts came out entirely
> > > > > > > without 
> > > > > > >         attribution or 
> > > > > > >         >  editorial information. Issue 1 consists of
> > > > > > > fifty-seven 
> > > > > > >         numbered 
> > > > > > >         >  sections, concluding comically and somewhat 
> > > > > > >         self-reflexively with a 
> > > > > > >         >  lone plaintive voice asking, "Does everyone
> > > > > > > here know 
> > > > > > >         what / an ashram 
> > > > > > >         >  is except me?" 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  The product of a group of people gathering at
> > > > > > > Mayer's 
> > > > > > >         loft, writing 
> > > > > > >         >  for 8 hours, and then publishing the results,
> > > > > > > this first 
> > > > > > >         issue 
> > > > > > >         >  of Unnatural Acts exhibits all of the
> > > > > > > unevenness that 
> > > > > > >         might be 
> > > > > > >         >  expected from such a process. The second issue,
> > > > > > > which 
> > > > > > >         opened its doors 
> > > > > > >         >  to people outside the workshop, offers an
> > > > > > > explicit 
> > > > > > >         account of 
> > > > > > >         >  editorial policy and aesthetic agenda. A
> > > > > > > sidebar that 
> > > > > > >         continues from 
> > > > > > >         >  the front to the back cover declares that "each
> > > > > > > issue of 
> > > > > > >         unnatural 
> > > > > > >         >  acts magazine will be a collaborative writing 
> > > > > > >         experiment," going on to 
> > > > > > >         >  name the eleven contributors, indicate the
> > > > > > > date 
> > > > > > >         (November 11, 1972) on 
> > > > > > >         >  which the issue was written, and describe the
> > > > > > > fairly 
> > > > > > >         elaborate 
> > > > > > >         >  procedure out of which it developed: each
> > > > > > > writer brought 
> > > > > > >         a page of 
> > > > > > >         >  writing which was traded, rewritten, and
> > > > > > > discarded. 
> > > > > > >         Participants then 
> > > > > > >         >  selected one of the rewritten documents and
> > > > > > > used it as 
> > > > > > >         the basis for a 
> > > > > > >         >  new piece of writing. They noted the time at
> > > > > > > which their 
> > > > > > >         new work was 
> > > > > > >         >  completed, returned it to a common pile, and
> > > > > > > then chose 
> > > > > > >         another page 
> > > > > > >         >  to begin the process again; in the end, the
> > > > > > > poems were 
> > > > > > >         arranged 
> > > > > > >         >  chronologically to produce the magazine's
> > > > > > > format. The 
> > > > > > >         front and back 
> > > > > > >         >  covers (which you've got) contain a kind of
> > > > > > > disembodied 
> > > > > > >         conversation, 
> > > > > > >         >  commenting on this process and theorizing
> > > > > > > collaboration 
> > > > > > >         more 
> > > > > > >         >  generally. Just yesterday I found in the
> > > > > > > archive a 
> > > > > > >         sketch for this 
> > > > > > >         >  cover where this material is called a
> > > > > > > "manifesto" - it 
> > > > > > >         seems typical 
> > > > > > >         >  of the Unnatural Actsinitiative to revise the
> > > > > > > manifesto 
> > > > > > >         into a more 
> > > > > > >         >  dialogic and accretive form. 
> > > > > > >         >  Unnatural Acts 5 also elaborates its process,
> > > > > > > which 
> > > > > > >         directed writers 
> > > > > > >         >  and visual artists through four stages of
> > > > > > > collaborative 
> > > > > > >         engagement and 
> > > > > > >         >  exchange. After that issue, the magazine
> > > > > > > terminated, a 
> > > > > > >         fact 
> > > > > > >         >  attributable to funding problems, though it has
> > > > > > > been 
> > > > > > >         suggested that 
> > > > > > >         >  potential contributors from the community were 
> > > > > > >         discouraged by the 
> > > > > > >         >  magazine's no-names policy. "Our poems aren't
> > > > > > > our 
> > > > > > >         appearances," one 
> > > > > > >         >  excerpt from the Issue 2 cover maintains, "when
> > > > > > > you take 
> > > > > > >         out the I's / 
> > > > > > >         >  everybody is matched." It is tempting to
> > > > > > > imagine a 
> > > > > > >         community as well 
> > > > > > >         >  as a poetics founded on "taking out the I's,"
> > > > > > > and it 
> > > > > > >         seems that 
> > > > > > >         >  Mayer's workshop and the extended group of
> > > > > > > writers and 
> > > > > > >         artists 
> > > > > > >         >  surrounding it began to approximate such a
> > > > > > > space. In its 
> > > > > > >         desire to 
> > > > > > >         >  take on the "unnatural" as its primary model
> > > > > > > for 
> > > > > > >         producing artworks, 
> > > > > > >         >  the workshop deviates radically from the
> > > > > > > fantasies of 
> > > > > > >         >  self-legitimation and organicism manifest in so
> > > > > > > many of 
> > > > > > >         the New 
> > > > > > >         >  Americans' poetic and institutional
> > > > > > > productions. The 
> > > > > > >         "necessity . . . 
> > > > > > >         >  to be as wood is," declared by Olson in
> > > > > > > "Projective 
> > > > > > >         Verse," is nowhere 
> > > > > > >         >  felt in Unnatural Acts, and Berrigan's
> > > > > > > half-ironic 
> > > > > > >         claim, that "I was 
> > > > > > >         >  and am "C" magazine...And I intended and intend
> > > > > > > for "C" 
> > > > > > >         to exist as a 
> > > > > > >         >  personal aesthetic statement by me," finds no 
> > > > > > >         correlative in Mayer's 
> > > > > > >         >  near-invisible self-positioning. In place of
> > > > > > > individual 
> > > > > > >         ambition, 
> > > > > > >         >  process itself appears to reign. In Issue 2,
> > > > > > > the 
> > > > > > >         collaboratively 
> > > > > > >         >  produced poems begin to meditate on the
> > > > > > > linguistic and 
> > > > > > >         social 
> > > > > > >         >  implications of this fact. I've given you one
> > > > > > > such poem, 
> > > > > > >         apparently 
> > > > > > >         >  submitted at 3:55. It begins: 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  m 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  Begin forwarded message: 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  NOT CONTENT: UN-NATURAL ACTS 
> > > > > > >         >  >  w/ Amina Cain and Jennifer Karmin 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Performances and Collaborative Writing
> > > > > > > Marathon 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Taking its name from the historic
> > > > > > > collaborative 
> > > > > > >         writing marathons 
> > > > > > >         >  >  led by Bernadette Mayer and others in NYC
> > > > > > > during 
> > > > > > >         1972-73, UN-NATURAL 
> > > > > > >         >  >  ACTS will explore the themes of hunger, war,
> > > > > > > and 
> > > > > > >         desire through 
> > > > > > >         >  >  public acts of collaboration. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Beginning with two days of installation and 
> > > > > > >         performance by Amina 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Cain and Jennifer Karmin, a group of ten
> > > > > > > writers will 
> > > > > > >         gather on the 
> > > > > > >         >  >  third day to write together over the course
> > > > > > > of eight 
> > > > > > >         hours. In a 
> > > > > > >         >  >  daily ritual inaugurated on the fourth day,
> > > > > > > the 
> > > > > > >         outline of a new 
> > > > > > >         >  >  person's body will be traced onto the bodies
> > > > > > > of text 
> > > > > > >         until the 
> > > > > > >         >  >  project closes on 8 August. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  EVENTS: 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Wed 21 July: Installation (12-5pm) and
> > > > > > > Hunger Texts 
> > > > > > >         Read in the 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Dark performance (5-5:30pm) by Amina Cain 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Thu 22 July: Installation (12-5pm) and 4000
> > > > > > > Words 4000 
> > > > > > >         Dead 
> > > > > > >         >  >  street performance (5-6pm) by Jennifer
> > > > > > > Karmin 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Fri 23 July: Unnatural Acts, 8 hours of
> > > > > > > collaborative 
> > > > > > >         writing 
> > > > > > >         >  >  (12-8pm). Collaborators include: Jennifer
> > > > > > > Karmin, 
> > > > > > >         Amina Cain, Teresa 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Carmody, Saehee Cho, India Radfar, K.
> > > > > > > Lorraine Graham, 
> > > > > > >         Harold 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Abramowitz, Janice Lee, and a few
> > > > > > > surprises. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  July 24: Collaborative Reading and Artists'
> > > > > > > Talk 
> > > > > > >         (4-6pm). Readers 
> > > > > > >         >  >  include: Jennifer Karmin, Amina Cain, Teresa
> > > > > > > Carmody, 
> > > > > > >         Saehee Cho, 
> > > > > > >         >  >  India Radfar, K. Lorraine Graham, Harold
> > > > > > > Abramowitz, 
> > > > > > >         Janice Lee, and 
> > > > > > >         >  >  more. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  UN-NATURAL ACTS is part of NOT CONTENT, a
> > > > > > > series of 
> > > > > > >         text projects 
> > > > > > >         >  >  curated by Les Figues Press for Kim
> > > > > > > Schoenstadt's 
> > > > > > >         Painted 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Over/Under: Part 1. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  >  Photo Credit: Bernadette Mayer and Jennifer
> > > > > > > Karmin 
> > > > > > >         August 2009, an 
> > > > > > >         >  >  afternoon of collaborative writing Photo by
> > > > > > > Philip 
> > > > > > >         Good. 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         >  > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > >         > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         -- 
> > > > > > >         Adam Hyde 
> > > > > > >         Founder FLOSS Manuals 
> > > > > > >         German mobile : + 49 177 4935122 
> > > > > > >         Email : adam at flossmanuals.net 
> > > > > > >         irc: irc.freenode.net #flossmanuals 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         "Free manuals for free software" 
> > > > > > >         http://www.flossmanuals.net/about 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > Mike Linksvayer, Vice President 
> > > > > > > Creative Commons 
> > > > > > > 171 Second Street, Suite 300 
> > > > > > > San Francisco, CA  94105 
> > > > > > > office: +1 415-369-8480 
> > > > > > > fax: +1 415-278-9419 
> > > > > > > various: mlinksva 
> > > > > > > email (preferred): scroll up 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Please note: the contents of this email are not intended
> > > > > > > to be 
> > > > > > > legal advice nor should they be relied upon as, or
> > > > > > > represented to 
> > > > > > > be legal advice.  Creative Commons cannot and does not
> > > > > > > give legal 
> > > > > > > advice. You need to assess the suitability of Creative
> > > > > > > Commons 
> > > > > > > tools for your particular situation, which may include
> > > > > > > obtaining 
> > > > > > > appropriate legal advice from a licensed attorney. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Note: I am in the office Monday through Friday, though I
> > > > > > > work from 
> > > > > > > home some days. I am reachable electronically more hours
> > > > > > > than is 
> > > > > > > healthy. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This email is: 
> > > > > > >    [ ] already on wikileaks   [X] ask first   [ ] top
> > > > > > > secret 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Sent from a full-sized keyboard interfacing with
> > > > > > > GNU/Linux 
> > > > > > > 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 3 22:02:19 UTC
> > > > > > > 2010 i686 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 

-- 
Adam Hyde
Founder FLOSS Manuals
German mobile : + 49 177 4935122
Email : adam at flossmanuals.net
irc: irc.freenode.net #flossmanuals

"Free manuals for free software"
http://www.flossmanuals.net/about





More information about the Discuss mailing list