[FM Discuss] Notes on open source documentation from Open Source convention

Andy Oram andyo at oreilly.com
Fri Jul 24 10:47:40 PDT 2009


I'll toss in my agreement too. If you set up a system for evaluating writers, how do you know the evaluators know what they're doing? Maybe a writer has great ideas but has problems expressing them, perhaps because he's writing in a non-native language. But perhaps a little loving clean-up would fix it; that might escape the gatekeepers.

Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Janet Swisher" <jmswisher at gmail.com>
To: discuss at lists.flossmanuals.net
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:42:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [FM Discuss] Notes on open source documentation from Open Source convention

I'm also in favor of accepting anyone who volunteers, and relying on
reviews to ensure quality. People whose work is truly bad might be a
burden to the group, but those people are unlikely to volunteer in the
first place, because they probably don't enjoy the work.


...



More information about the Discuss mailing list